


Metacity Themes by envyouraudience 1 comment
Thanks. - Feb 17 2008

GTK2 Themes by macraph 21 comments
I would have mentioned more of a color selection but you already answered that question in a previous post. :-) - Jan 06 2008

Wallpapers Debian by Late-Eight 4 comments

Gnome Screenshots by fsilvasampaio 2 comments

CD/DVD Labels by Achim 2 comments
Maybe you could say "For your PowerPC/POWERx based systems" or something of that nature?
Just a thought. :-) - Jun 25 2007

GTK2 Themes by SegPhault 8 comments
Thanks. - Jun 24 2007
As for the button delay, I'm using the theme on Ubuntu 7.04 on a Pentium 4 laptop (HP Compaq nx9010) using a Radeon IGP 340M and it's got 512 MB RAM. The delay is noticeable on the maximize and minimize buttons moreso than on the close button, but it's there.
The Classic Metacity package that mimics the Platinum look doesn't exhibit this delay, so there might be something there you could use:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Classic?content=46208 - Jun 09 2007
I love the Metacity theme.....great job
Two things though...
One, the color looks to be a little darker than on the sample image you provided. I don't know if it's maybe my laptop screen, but it does seem a little darker. If making it a little lighter changes the integrity of the theme, then I'll live with it. :-D
Two, there seems to be approximately a 1-second delay from when you press any of the buttons to when the button shows itself depressed. Any way to fix that?
Thanks! - Jun 09 2007

Wallpaper Other by AngelusNoctis 2 comments

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
Also, neglecting to use your freedom of speech is different from practicing restraint. The former is out of ignorance while the latter is out of wisdom. I have the freedom to say anything I want, but what good is it if its at a loss when more could have been gained by not saying anything or by saying just enough that was necessary to get the point across? Fine, you voiced your opinion on the subject. But was it necessary to go into this whole tirade of comments? I don't think so. - May 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
I don't remember the submitter saying that he didn't want any criticisms. I think he expected it but not to this degree. And to be honest, some of the comments did start to go the personal route, hence his reaction. Both of which I personally question from both parties.
And yes, freedom is nice...it's also a two way street.
To be honest, my issue with this thread was that it always happens and always ends up with the same result. So why bother starting them over and over and over and over.....get my drift? Usually I don't bother, but it just seems like such a waste of time that could be used concentrating on productive tasks like creating the artwork for your favorite desktop environment on your favorite system, whatever that might be or say.
But unfortunately, history still repeats itself. - May 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
For the record, I have seen some Buddhist artwork here a while back that I believed was beautiful despite what I believe about Buddhism. I didn't cast a vote for those submissions, but I didn't vote it down because the message was contrary to what I believe. Others here that are atheist have also done the same with other religious submissions, and that is respectable.
I figure that if the submissions here are still visible, it's because the admins of the site are OK with it. They won't stop you from posting whatever you want so long as it falls within their rules. Obviously, something that would promote hate in any form would be removed, but I'm not an admin here so I don't know. I don't believe this does that, hence why it's probably still here. - May 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
Art is subjective, but as I said this is a site about artistic expression. At this point, you come off as though you're looking for a fight. You trying to attack him on his beliefs and what he can submit is no better than someone censoring your right to say what you're saying now because you don't believe in a deity. Consider yourself blessed that you have this freedom...in some countries, people are tortured or killed for saying stuff like this. Agree to disagree and vote by what you think of the art. That's my SUGGESTION...what you do with that is your choice. Free will, good sir....even the "imaginary friends" (as you say) in the Bible were given that. - May 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
Art is subjective, but as I said this is a site about artistic expression. At this point, you come off as though you're looking for a fight. You trying to attack him on his beliefs and what he can submit is no better than someone censoring your right to say what you're saying now because you don't believe in a deity. Consider yourself blessed that you have this freedom...in some countries, people are tortured or killed for saying stuff like this. Agree to disagree and vote by what you think of the art. That's my SUGGESTION...what you do with that is your choice. Free will, good sir....even the "imaginary friends" (as you say) in the Bible were given that. - May 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by falco101 15 comments

Wallpaper Other by falco101 15 comments

Wallpaper Other by falco101 96 comments
I'm going to say what's been said before on this site many times ad nauseum:
"If you don't like it, don't view it!"
There. Plain and simple.
I'm a Christian and I don't agree with some of the nude or any of the satanic submissions. Not all nudes are tasteless (look at works from Michelangelo, Boticelli, etc.) and a select few submissions have been tasteful, but there are others that just scream "trash" IMO. Do I go screaming to the admins about how offensive this is (especially when kids visit this site)? No. I just ignore it and move on to the next submission that interests me. I've even appreciated the good artwork of those of other faiths because the art was good despite where I stand in my beliefs.
And don't vote it down because you don't agree with the message. This is Gnome-Look/KDE-Look/<your-favorite-DE>-Look, not digg.com. It's about the artwork and the quality of it. Stick to that and respect the beliefs and standpoints of everyone else for goodness sakes!
Sheesh! Get a grip, folks! - May 05 2007

GTK2 Themes by slackdude 7 comments
Here ya go... :-)
http://www.mandolux.com/archive/2006/0312.html - Sep 14 2006

GTK2 Themes by raceimaztion 4 comments

GTK2 Themes by cimi86 14 comments
Thanks! - Jul 23 2006

Metacity Themes by soffcore 9 comments

GTK2 Themes by slackdude 7 comments

GTK2 Themes by slackdude 7 comments
I prefer it this way personally, even though it does make them a bit fuzzy. It's not that fuzzy that it would bother my eyesight. :-) - Jun 09 2006
Kudos to the creator of this Metacity theme. - Jun 04 2006

GTK2 Themes by blackbird 7 comments

Wallpaper Other by smashse 10 comments
Thanks! - Feb 03 2006

deKorator Themes by Eldarion 20 comments
Nice design, but I also did find the first port pf Clearlooks2 to KDE and I was also unimpressed with it. So far, Plastik has the upper hand for me. :-/ - Jan 27 2006

deKorator Themes by Eldarion 20 comments

Icon Sub-Sets by Sparrk 12 comments

GTK2 Themes by slackdude 6 comments

GTK2 Themes by slackdude 6 comments
Again, this was just a color mod to the original Clearlooks GTK2 theme, nothing more. - Jan 13 2006

Cliparts by ellion 5 comments
What I don't agree is that Gnome is ugly. I've seen my share of ugliness from KDE more often than not, probably just as much as I've seen from Gnome. Instead, mention how you prefer the functionality of one over the other. I use both and I enjoy/dislike a lot of things about both DEs in both functionality and looks.
And ellion, while KDE-Look and Gnome-Look are basically the same portal, if what you say is correct then we would see everything from KDE on the Gnome section and vice-versa. And that's not even talking about the XFCE section! It's up to the user WHERE they want to display the submission. - Jan 08 2006

Wallpaper Other by SilvioTO 7 comments
Definitely voted up for uniqueness. ;-) - Dec 16 2005

Wallpaper Other by jAVaCidBuRN 2 comments
Just an opinion.
Anyways, great work. - Nov 14 2005

KDE 3.x Window Decorations by maitre 15 comments
It's just that it's kind of counter-culture to be using Linux and an open source DE with a Microsoft Windows logo on your window manager. I mean, even themes that mimic those in Windows aren't as counter-culture as the Windows logo on your DE. A theme is subjective and I have no issues with people using Windows-looking themesm, but plastering a Windows logo just doesn't make sense since it's not even Windows!
I thought it was a great theme until I saw the Windows logo at the far left of the window manager. Kind of like a famous painting with the artist's name misspelled.
It's not a kneejerk response. It's just that Microsoft, the Microsoft logo, and other MS trademarks have nothing to do with what Linux and other open source projects are all about. Hence, counter-culture. - Oct 19 2005

Wallpaper Other by masterlinux 1 comment

Various KDE 1.-4. Improvements by drx 16 comments
...circa 1984.
Actually, it reminds me of GEOS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:GeOS_Commodore_64.gif
It also harks back to the Apple IIGS.
Cool though. ;-) - Sep 09 2005

Wallpaper Other by odrakir 1 comment

Wallpaper Other by jojo965 3 comments

Wallpaper Other by odrakir 3 comments

Wallpaper Other by arenyart 1 comment

Wallpaper Other by arenyart 1 comment
Thanks. :-) - Jun 21 2005

Wallpaper Other by luismanson 4 comments
Would it be too much trouble to ask for some Debian and Slack versions?
Thanks! - Jun 04 2005

Wallpaper Other by FordPrefect 4 comments
Looking forward to the rest of your work. Great stuff! - May 08 2005